NZ Ministry of Health Web Page
Printed 11/26/2009 03:37:45 AM  Back   Print   


Primary Health Care

Research & Evaluation of Primary Health Care Strategy (PHCS) initiatives





Overview


The Ministry of Health is managing a portfolio of evaluations as an integral part of the implementation of the Primary Health Care Strategy.

The evaluation portfolio focuses on three key areas:
There are a number of projects that are part of the evaluation portfolio. Each focuses on specific aspects of the Primary Health Care Strategy but have a number of common elements:

The central part of the evaluation portfolio is the Evaluation of the Implementation and Intermediate Outcomes of the Primary Health Care Strategy. The evaluation, being led by Victoria University’s Health Services Research Centre, began in mid 2003 and will be completed in June 2009.

There are a number of projects which look more closely at specific aspects of the Primary Health Care Strategy such as increasing access and improving services for people with chronic conditions. These evaluations and related research will feed into the overall evaluation of the implementation of the Primary Health Care Strategy as well as having stand alone value. These include evaluations of the:

Most of these evaluations have strong formative components - that is, findings are reported through the implementation with a how the Ministry and DHBs can improve implementation and design features of the Primary Health Care Strategy.


Back to top

National Primary Medical Care Survey (NatMedCa) Reports


The National Medical Care Survey (NatMedCa) on primary health care providers and patient visits to them was carried out in 2001/02. The research was led by Professor Peter Davis (who also led the WaiMedCa study) with a team from the Centre for Health Services Research and Policy, University of Auckland and academics from other universities. The Health Research Council funded the original research project with input from the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP) and the academic medical departments.

The Ministry subsequently funded nine more in-depth reports on aspects of primary health care delivery. These were:
  1. Family Doctors: Methodology and description of the activity of private GPs;
  2. Primary Health Care in Community-governed Non-Profits: The work of doctors and nurses;
  3. Maori Providers: Primary health care delivered by doctors and nurses;
  4. A Comparison of Primary Health Care Provided by Rural and Non-Rural General Practices
  5. The work of doctors in accident and medical clinics
  6. A comparison of Māori and non- Māori patient visits to doctors;
  7. Pacific patterns in primary health care: a comparison of Pacific and all patient visits to doctors;
  8. A description of activity of selected hospital emergency departments in New Zealand;
  9. Nurses and their work in primary health care.

Read the NatMedCa Reports

Back to top

Evaluation of the Implementation & Intermediate Outcomes of the PHCS


The central part of the evaluation portfolio is the Evaluation of the Implementation and Intermediate Outcomes of the Primary Health Care Strategy. This evaluation is jointly funded by the Health Research Council, the Ministry of Health and ACC, and is being led by Victoria University’s Health Services Research Centre. The evaluation began in mid 2003 and will be completed in mid 2009.

The Evaluation of the Implementation and Intermediate Outcomes of the PHS: First Reposrt May 2005


This report was based on interviews with more than 160 policy makers, stakeholders, and participants from both within and outside PHOs. It outlined the aims and objectives and methodology and presents early findings. The results showed:
Evaluation of the implementation and intermediate outcomes of the Primary Health Care Strategy (www.victoria.ac.nz)
Back to top

Evaluation of Primary Health Care Strategy: Practice Data by Dr Jacqueline Cumming and Dr Barry Gribben. September 2007


This report uses quantitative data drawn from the Practice Management Systems of a representative sample of 99 General Practices. The data covers the period between July 2001 (before the Strategy was implemented) and June 2005. At that stage the increased subsidies had been rolled out to all patients in Access Practices and the 0-5, 6-17 and 65+ age groups in Interim Practices.
The report seeks to answer the following questions, for different population groups and funding models:
That data is analysed to demonstrate:
Results are presented by age group, ethnicity and practice funding types.

The report shows that:

Evaluation of Primary Health Care Strategy: Practice Data (PDF)

Back to top

Primary Health Organisations: The First Year (June 2002 - July 2003) from the PHO Perspective


In April 2003 the Ministry of Health contracted Victoria University’s Health Services Research Centre to undertake a small study reviewing the experiences of the first PHOs – those established between 1 July 2002 and 1 April 2003.
The aims of the review were to:
PHOs: The First Year and Appendix 3 from the Health Services Research Centre

Intersectoral Community Action for Health (ICAH) Evaluation: An Overview


In 2001 the Ministry of Health funded four ICAH groups (in Northland, Counties Manukau, Otaki and Porirua) to develop different ways of bringing together community and health sector organisations to improve the health status of Māori, Pacific and Quintile 5 people living in those areas.

The evaluators concluded that each of the ICAH initiatives showed evidence they were working to reduce inequalities, all the projects were working intersectorally, the role and wisdom of the community was vital, the role of the Ministry of Health in the contracting process was generally seen positively and the future of the ICAHs, which were developed before the introduction of District Health Boards (DHBs) and Primary Health Organisations (PHOs), will rely on closer relationship between these groups.

The time covered by the report predates much of the implementation the Primary Health Care Strategy. However it provides valuable examples of ways that PHOs can work with their local DHBs and their community.

Intersectoral Community Action for Health (ICAH) Evaluation: An Overview

Back to top

Evaluation of Care Plus


Care Plus provides additional funding to PHOs for people who have to visit a GP or nurse more frequently because of significant chronic conditions such as diabetes or heart disease, acute medical or mental health needs, or a terminal illness. Implementation of Care Plus began in July 2004.
Care Plus aims to:

Review of the Implementation of Care Plus (December 2006)
Prepared for the Ministry of Health by CBG Research

Review of the Implementation of Care Plus

Care Plus: An Overview
This publication explains Care Plus in more detail, how it was developed and contains a summary of the experiences of the three PHOs which trialled Care Plus: HealthWEST PHO in West Auckland (Waitemata DHB); Tihewa Mauriora PHO in Kaikohe (Northland DHB); Canterbury Community PHO (Canterbury DHB).

Care Plus: an Overview (PDF, 103 kB)
Care Plus: an Overview (Word, 107 kB)

Care Plus Process Report (March 2004)
Prepared for the Ministry of Health by CBG Health Research

Care Plus Process Report (Word, 436 KB)
Care Plus Process Report (PDF, 152 KB)

Care Plus Investigation: Estimating Case Loads (December 2003)
Prepared for the Ministry of Health by CBG Health Research

Care Plus Estimating Case Loads (Word, 527 KB)
Care Plus Estimating Case Loads (PDF, 194 KB)

Care Plus Formative Report (September 2003)
Prepared for the Ministry of Health by CBG Health Research

Care Plus Formative Report (Word, 453 KB)
Care Plus Formative Report (PDF, 106 KB)

Back to top

Evaluation of Primary Mental Health Initiatives


The Ministry of Health is funding 41 PHOs to implement primary mental health initiatives and innovations projects in PHOs through DHBs. The Ministry is also funding an evaluation of the initiatives and innovations programme. The evaluation will collect quantitative and qualitative information and will consider the following areas:
The evaluation is being completed by a group of researchers from the University of Otago, and has been extended until June 2008. An interim report will be published in late March 2007, and other reports will be provided throughout the year.


Read more about the evaluation

Back to top

Evaluation of Reducing Inequalities Contingency Funded (RICF) Projects


In 2002, funding was allocated on an ongoing basis to help providers develop or enhance services aimed at reducing health inequalities. There are 35 initiatives funded through the Reducing Inequalities Contingency Fund to increase access to primary health care services.
The initiatives are diverse in their content and objectives, but can be classified in four groups:
In January 2007, CBG Research Ltd completed a
final evaluation of the 35 initiatives.

In August 2003, CBG Research Ltd completed a progress summary report on the evaluation of the projects.

CBG Summary Report August 2003 (Word, 103 KB)
CBG Summary Report August 2003 (PDF, 132 KB)

Back to top

Evaluation of Primary Health Care Nursing Innovations


Eleven nursing innovations supporting the development of new models of primary care nursing practice and fostering nurse leadership were funded by the Ministry of Health from January 2004 to mid-2006.

There were two main kinds of innovation and the evaluation reports on the varying levels of success across the 11 innovations.

Innovations that fostered the role of the nurse practitioner and services that focus on chronic care management and services for familes, whanau and young people are of particular interest for those planning services for the future.

The Evaluation of the Eleven Primary Health Care Nursing Innovation Projects


Future Reports


A number of further reports are expected in 2007 and 2008. Topics include

Quantitative analyses
Quantitative, qualitative and survey analyses (2007, 2008)
Economic analyses (2008)

Page last updated: 30 October 2007
Back to top