Go to home page - Ministry of HealthWhats New - Ministry of HealthPublications - Ministry of HealthForums - Ministry of HealthLinks - Ministry of HealthContact - Ministry of HealthAbout - Ministry of HealthSearch - Ministry of HealthSkip Navigation
Print this  Email this

Homoeopathic Arnica for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Injury


Complementary and Alternative Therapies Evidence-based Summary


Date of review: November 2004

Injuries from bumps, falls and other accidents can cause bruising and swelling to skin and muscles. A number of treatments are available to help reduce swelling and bruising, including icing of injured areas of skin and applying creams. Homoeopathic preparations, particularly flowers from the herb arnica montana (arnica), are also used by some for the treatment for bruises, sprains and sore muscles. This evidence summary identified one systematic review and 14 clinical trials (involving 1,275 people) that examined the effectiveness of homoeopathic arnica for the easing of pain, swelling and bruising caused by a variety of accidents.

View also in PDF format - Homeopathic arnica for the treatment of soft tissue injury (PDF, 65 KB)

Back to the Complementary and Alternative Therapies Evidence-based Summaries page


Results summary


Overall, the results from the trials indicate that homoeopathic arnica has no clear effect on bruising, swelling, or pain after soft tissue injury. Side effects related to the use of homoeopathic arnica for the treatment of soft tissue injury tend to mild and reversible, and include stomach irritation, tiredness (lethargy), dry mouth, and headache. However, there is no clear difference in the proportion of people experiencing side effects who took homoeopathic arnica compared to those who took a placebo. Side effects related to the use of homoeopathic arnica in general tend to be mild and reversible, and include headaches, tiredness, skin eruptions, dizziness, diarrhoea, and/or the temporary worsening of symptoms (often referred to as “homoeopathic aggravation”). Severe and potentially lethal side effects are associated with the ingestion of the essential oil or the herb itself, and only the homoeopathic preparation of arnica is safe for oral use.

Back to top

Background


Soft tissue injury


Falls, sudden forceful contact with a blunt instrument, and surgery often result in bleeding and inflammation deep in the muscle fibres. Symptoms of acute inflammation include pain, heat, redness, and swelling. Some bruising may also accompany this process. Although the inflammatory process is vital to the process of muscle regeneration and healing, it can cause further swelling, which can be detrimental to the healing process. The goal of treatment for such injuries is to minimize bleeding and control pain.

Arnica


Arnica (Arnica montana) is an alpine herb native to the mountains of Siberia and central Europe.1 Arnica grows from a cylindrical hairy bulb with a creeping underground stem.2 The flowers are scented and daisy-like, and have 10-14 bright rays each with three notches at the end.2 Arnica is also known as leopardsbane, wolfsbane, and Mountain tobacco.2 The flower head of arnica is the main part used in herbal medicine.2 Traditionally, arnica has been used as a herbal medicine throughout North America, Germany and Russia, since the 16th century.

Sesquiterpene lactones are considered the active constituents of arnica and are thought to help reduce inflammation (anti-inflammatory) and reduce pain (analgesic).2 Through this action, arnica helps improves the blood flow to areas of tissue damage, thereby assisting in the healing process.3 Arnica is also said to have some antibiotic activity. Arnica also contains two toxins, namely lobeline and myristic acid (found in the essential oil of arnica).2,3

Homoeopathy


Homoeopathy aims to stimulate the body’s own healing responses and is based upon three main principles, namely the principle of “similars”, the use of dilutions called “potencies”, and the totality of symptoms or “holism”.4,5 The principle of “similars” is the theory of treating like with like, in that people with particular signs and symptoms can be cured if given a drug that produces the same signs and symptoms in a healthy individual. The principle of “potencies” is the idea that remedies retain biological activity if they are repeatedly diluted and shaken.4 The principle of “holism” is that preparations are most effective when all symptoms are considered. For example, two people presenting with a cold but different symptoms would receive a different homoeopathic treatment. Preparation of homoeopathic products involves a method called “potentisation” (stepwise dilution), combined with “succussion” (vigorous shaking).6 In assessing the patient, homeopaths often take into account a range of physical, emotional and lifestyle factors in order to identify the best homoeopathic preparation (or “simile’). Many homeopaths also recommend changes to diet and lifestyle.7 The practice of homoeopathy is not currently regulated by legislation in New Zealand. Many homeopaths are affiliated with a selfregulating professional body (such as the New Zealand Council of Homeopaths).

Homoeopathic arnica


Homoeopathic practitioners often recommend the use of homoeopathic arnica to help improve the healing of tissues after falls, surgery and other injuries that result in bruising and bleeding.2 In addition, homoeopathic arnica is sometimes given before surgery, (including dental surgery) and childbirth to help reduce the severity of any expected soft tissue injury. The extremely dilute homoeopathic preparation of arnica is considered safe for internal use, but only in appropriate therapeutic dosages.

Back to top

Evidence reviewed in this summary


Efficacy information


  • Systematic reviews: One systematic review on this topic was identified for this evidence summary.8 One other review was identified but this considered a variety of homoeopathic preparations for a number of disorders, and was therefore not included in this summary.4
  • Clinical trials: The above systematic review8 identified eight randomised, placebo-controlled trials in which 338 people were enrolled.9-16 Since this review was undertaken, six additional randomised placebo-controlled trials (involving 937 people) on this topic have been published17-22. No clinical trials of homoeopathic arnica for soft tissue injury are known to be currently underway (see www.controlled-trials.com).
  • Case-control studies/Cohort studies/Case studies: Given the extensive coverage of the above systematic review, no case-control, cohort or case series studies were assessed for this evidence summary.

Safety information


  • Systematic reviews: The systematic review identified above did not examine side effects related to the use of homoeopathic arnica, and no other systematic reviews were identified that specifically addressed this topic.8 However, two systematic reviews on the safety of homoeopathic medicines in general were identified.23,24One review focused on homoeopathy aggravations (the temporary worsening of symptoms), and identified 25 relevant randomized placebo-controlled trials, involving 3,437 people.23 The second review summarised all adverse effects related to homoeopathy published in English from 1970 to 1995, and identified 53 relevant studies.24
  • Clinical trials: Three of the 14 trials identified in the efficacy section above reported on side effects related to the use of homoeopathic arnica.18, 20, 21
  • Other studies: No further studies were identified that reported on side effects associated with the use of homoeopathic arnica for soft tissue injury. However, a general survey involving 1,025 users of homoeopathy across six European countries was identified that provided details on side effects of homoeopathy in general.25 Given the comprehensive information provided by the above studies, no further information on side effects was sought.
Back to top

Evidence on efficacy


Evidence on the use of homoeopathic arnica for the treatment of soft tissue injury is available from one systematic review8, that included eight placebo-controlled trials (involving a total of 338 people.9-16 The subjects in the trials were being treated for soft tissue injury from a variety of causes including delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS)13,15 and the prevention of postsurgical complications9, 11, 14, 16. Two trials examined the effect of arnica on healthy volunteers after "experimentally inflicted mechanical bruising".10, 12 Arnica was administered orally in various potencies ranging from D2 (mother tincture diluted 1 in 10, twice) to M10 (diluted 1 in 1000, 10 times). The dose schedule also varied between the studies. The results from the systematic review8 indicate that:

There are few well-conducted clinical trials that examine the efficacy of arnica compared with placebo or any other treatment for soft tissue injuries (such as bruising and exercise-induced muscle soreness). Consequently, results found may be biased in some way.

Small numbers of patients were enrolled in the included trials (only one trial had more than 100 participants14), which makes it difficult to know if there are any important differences between homoeopathic arnica and placebo treatments for the treatment of pain and inflammation.

In general the well conducted studies yielded negative findings, either of no difference in effect between arnica and placebo or a difference favouring the placebo treatment.

There is little evidence that homoeopathic arnica is more effective than a placebo in relieving the pain associated with bruising and swelling.

There is no evidence to suggest that a particular potency of arnica or dose regimen is superior to another potency or dose regimen.

There is no evidence that homoeopathic arnica is more likely to benefit a particular patient group (e.g. those with bruises or injury to the limbs) over another (e.g. patients with bruising inflicted through abdominal or facial surgery).8

Six placebo-controlled clinical trials published after the systematic review was published, were also identified.17-22 These trials varied in the populations studied, and included long distance runners21 and patients undergoing surgery for carpal tunnel surgery18, 20, wisdom teeth removal19, abdominal hysterectomy17, and varicose veins.22 In addition, there were a variety of potencies (either the D6 or D30 preparations were used) and schedules of doses of arnica administered in the trials. The results from these five trials were consistent with the findings of the systematic review. Specifically, no significant difference between homoeopathic arnica and placebo was found for:

  • infection after abdominal hysterectomy17
  • grip strength and wrist circumference (a measure of swelling)18,20
  • pain after wisdom tooth removal19
  • swelling, and use of pain killers (analgesics) after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome20
  • pain two days after endurance running21
  • bruising and pain after surgery on varicose veins.22
Back to top

Evidence on safety


Findings from the three clinical trials reviewed for this summary18,20,21 indicate that:

Side effects associated with the use of homoeopathic arnica tend to be mild and reversible.

Two of the trials found no statistically significant difference between groups in the reporting of adverse events.
  • The largest trial, which enrolled 519 long distance runners, found 4.5% of runners who took homoeopathic arnica experienced side effects, compared to 6% of the patients who received the placebo21. The events reported included stomach irritation, tiredness (lethargy), headache and some musculoskeletal symptoms, some of which may also have been caused by the running itself.
  • In the second trial, eight (12.5%) of the 64 patients enrolled in the trial experienced side effects.20 Three patients who received arnica D30 reported dry mouth, throbbing in the head and neck, and headache, and two patients in the placebo group reported drowsiness and sore tongue.
The third trial found no adverse events in the study participants.18 No serious adverse events were reported by any of identified trials. In terms of side effects associated with the use of homoeopathy in general, a systematic review identified 12 relevant placebo-controlled clinical trials.24 Results from these trials showed that three in every 100 people taking a homoeopathic medication experienced at least one side effect. Side effects were minor and short-lived, and included headaches, tiredness, skin eruptions, dizziness, diarrhoea, and/or the temporary worsening of symptoms (often referred to as “homoeopathic aggravation”).24 A survey of 1,025 people receiving homoeopathy (of any type) found that 7.8% reported a “significant aggravation” and 25.4% reported a “slight aggravation” of their symptoms (which homeopaths believe is a positive sign that the correct remedy has been given – referred to as “proving”).25 However, results from a systematic review that specifically looked at homoeopathic aggravations found no difference in the proportion of aggravations reported by people taking placebo compared to those taking a homoeopathic treatment.23

It is important to note that the arnica herb and the essential oil made from the herb should not be eaten as an overdose of arnica extract can result in vomiting, diarrhoea, and excessive bleeding (haemorrhage).2 A number of publications state that deaths have occurred in people who have eaten the flowers or the arnica herb, although no documented evidence of these deaths could be located for this review.

Back to top

Cited references


  1. Mayor S. Trial shows that homoeopathic arnica is no better than placebo. British Medical Journal 2003;326(7384):303-303.
  2. Hanrahan C. Arnica. In: Krapp K, Longe JL, editors. The Gale Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine. Framington Hills, Mich.: Gale Group; 2000.
  3. Hattaway V. Arnica. New Zealand Pharmacy 2000;20(Apr):22-24
  4. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel N, Hedges LV, et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997;350(9081):834-843
  5. Jonas WB, Kaptchuk TJ, Linde K. A critical overview of homeopathy. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003;138(5):393-399
  6. Ernst E, Pilter M, Stevinson C, White A. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine: an evidence-based approach. London: Mosby; 2001
  7. Vickers A, Zollman C. ABC of complementary medicine. Homoeopathy. Bmj. 1999;319(7217):1115-8
  8. Ernst E, Pittler MH. Efficacy of homeopathic arnica: a systematic review of placebocontrolled clinical trials. Archives of Surgery 1998;133(11):1187-90
  9. Gibson J, Haslam Y, Laurenson L, Newman P, Pitt R, Robins M. Double blind trial of arnica in acute trauma patients. Homoeopathy 1991;41(3):54-5
  10. Campbell A. Two pilot controlled trials of Arnica montana. British Homeopathic Journal 1976;65:154-158
  11. Pinsent RJ, Baker GP, Ives G, Davey RW, Jonas S. Does arnica reduce pain and bleeding after dental extraction? Midland Homeopathy Resource Group Newsletter 1984;11:71-72
  12. Savage RH, Roe PF. A further double blind trial to assess the benefit of Arnica montana in acute stroke illness. British Homeopathic Journal 1978;67:211-22
  13. Tveiten D, Bruseth S, Borchgrevink CF, Lohne K. Effect of arnica D30 on hard physical exercise. A double blind controlled trial during the Oslo marathon. Tidsskr Nor Loegeforen 1991;111:3630-3631
  14. Kaziro GS. Metronidazole (Flagyl) and Arnica Montana in the prevention of post-surgical complications, a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 1984;22(1):42-9
  15. Hildebrandt G, Eltze C. Uber die wirksamkeit verschiedener potenzen von arnica beim experimentell erzeugten muskelkater. Erfarungsheikunde 1984;7(430-435).
  16. Livingston R. Homeopathy: Evergreen Medicine: jewel in the medical crown. Poole: Asher Press; 1991
  17. Hart O, Mullee MA, Lewith G, Miller J. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of homoeopathic Arnica C30 for pain and infection after total abdominal hysterectomy. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1997;90(2):73-78
  18. Jeffrey SLA, Belcher H. Use of Arnica to relieve pain after carpal-tunnel release surgery. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 2002;8(2):66-68
  19. Macedo SB, Carvalho JCT, Ferreira LR, Santos-Pinto R. Effect of Arnica montana on edema, trismus and pain after impacted molars extraction. Journal of Dental Research 2000;79:573-573
  20. Stevinson C, Devaraj VS, Fountain-Barber A, Hawkins S, Ernst E. Homeopathic Arnica for prevention of pain and bruising: randomized placebo-controlled trial in hand surgery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003;96(2):60-65
  21. Vickers AJ, Fisher P, Smith C, Wyllie SE, Rees R. Homeopathic Arnica 30x is ineffective for muscle soreness after long-distance running: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Clinical Journal of Pain 1998;14(3):227-31
  22. Wolf M, Tamaschke C, Mayer W, Heger M. Efficacy of Arnica in varicose vein surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Forschende Komplementarmedizin und Klassische Naturheilkunde 2003;10(5):242-7
  23. Grabia S, Ernst E. Homeopathic aggravations: a systematic review of randomised, placebocontrolled clinical trials. Homeopathy: the Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy. 2003;92(2):92-8
  24. Dantas F, Rampes H. Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review. British Homoeopathic Journal. 2000;89(Suppl 1):S35-8
  25. Anelli M, Scheepers L, Sermeus G, Van Wassenhoven M. Homeopathy and health related Quality of Life: a survey in six European countries. Homeopathy: the Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy. 2002;91(1):18-21
Back to top

Additional references:


  1. Aberer W, Strohal R. Homoeopathic preparations: severe adverse effects, unproven benefits. Dermatologica. 1991;182(4):253
  2. Alonso D, Lazarus MC, Baumann L. Effects of topical arnica gel on post-laser treatment bruises. Dermatologic Surgery 2002;28(8):686-688
  3. Anonymous. Allergic contact dermatitis from asteraceae/identification of an 8,9-epoxy thymoldiester as a contact allergen in Arnica sachalinensis. Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt 1988;36(3):79-82
  4. Anonymous. Arnica has been wrongly described and afterwards almost wiped out. Pharmazeutische Zeitung 2001;146(3):39-40
  5. Anonymous. Arnica montana and facial trauma treatment. Annales D Oto-Laryngologie Et De Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale 1977;94(1-2):65-65
  6. Anonymous. Erratum: Homoeopathic arnica dose (Pharmaceutical Journal (180)). Pharmaceutical Journal 2003;270(7238)
  7. Anonymous. Final report on the safety assessment of Arnica montana extract and Arnica montana. International Journal of Toxicology 2001;20:1-11
  8. Anonymous. Homeopathic Arnica: just a placebo. Prescrire International 2001;10(55):156
  9. Anonymous. Review of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathic Arnica does not show efficacy. Health Inform 1999;5(7):5.
  10. Anonymous. State-based chronic disease control: the Rocky Mountain tobacco-free challenge. Journal of the American Medical Association 1989;262(21)
  11. Baillargeon L, Drouin J, Desjardins L, Audet D, Leroux D. The effect of Arnica-montana on bleeding times: randomized clinical-trial. Canadian Family Physician 1994;40:225-225
  12. Baillargeon L, Drouin J, Desjardins L, Leroux D, Audet D. The effects of Arnica montana on blood coagulation: a randomized clinical assay. Canadian Family Physician 1993;39(NOV):2362-2367
  13. Bansal S. Infective arthropathy with tubercular aetiology. Indian Journal of Homoeopathic Medicine 1988;23(3):228-229
  14. Bates P. Arnica's bruised reputation. Pharmaceutical Journal 2003;270(7239):330
  15. Bauer CM, Lambert MI, Weight LM. The use of Arnica tablets by runners in the 90 Kilometer Comrades Marathon. South African Journal of Physiotherapy 2001;57(4):14-17
  16. Bauer CM, Weight L, Lambert MI. The use of Arnica for the treatment of soft-tissue damage. South African Journal of Physiotherapy 2002;58(1):34-40
  17. Bharatan V. Arnica montana L. Homoeopath 1995;56:341
  18. Brock FE. Arnica montana and vein disease. Zeitschrift fur Phytotherapie 1991;12(5):141- 145
  19. Concha Zambrano O. The effects of a complex homeopathic preparation on aerobic resistance, anaerobic capacity, strength, and flexibility. Biomedical Therapy 2000;18(1):172-175
  20. Daane SP. Potential for danger with Arnica montana. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2001;46(3):349-350
  21. Davis A. Arnica: a remedy for soft-tissue injuries. Practitioner 1989;233(1474):1129-1129
  22. Diederich K, Riggers U. Arnica. Der Merkurstab 2003;56(2):61-76
  23. Elsholz I. Unusual complication of a homeopathic preoperative treatment with Arnica D 12. Tierarztliche Umschau 1991;46(9):556-561
  24. Ernst E. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2002;54(6):577-582
  25. Ernst E. Homeopathic arnica. Author's reply. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003;96(4):206-207
  26. Ernst E. How objective are systematic reviews? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003;96(3):156-157
  27. Ernst E. Intangible risks of complementary and alternative medicine. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001;19(8):2365-2366
  28. Fisher P. Homoeopathic Arnica for sequelae of hand surgery. Focus on Alternative & Complementary Therapies 2003;8(2):208-209
  29. Ghosh A. Neoplasm and pleural effusions: a case report. British Homoeopath Journal 1987;76(4):218-220
  30. Hamdy MK, Sloan PE. Healing efficacy of homeopathic Arnica on experimentally bruised tissue. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 1986;181(3):472-472
  31. Hausen BM, Herrmann HD, Willuhn G. The sensitizing capacity of compositae plants. I. Occupational contact dermatitis from Arnica longifolia Eaton. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4(1):3-10
  32. Hausen BM. Arnica allergy. Hautarzt 1980;31(1):10-17
  33. Hausen BM. Identification of the allergens of Arnica montana L. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4(5):308
  34. Heck AM, DeWitt BA, Lukes AL. Potential interactions between alternative therapies and warfarin. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy 2000;57(13):1221-1227
  35. Herscu P. An Arnica save. Homoeopathic Heritage 1996;21(3):175-178
  36. Hormann HP, Korting HC. Acute allergic contact dermatitis to Arnica tincture. Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt 1994;42(6):246-249
  37. Iauk L, Lo Bue AM, Milazzo I, Rapisarda A, Blandino G. Antibacterial activity of medicinal plant extracts against periodontopathic bacteria. Phytotherapy Research 2003;17(6):599-604
  38. Ippen H. Problems concerning 'Arnica allergy'. Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt 1994;42(6):250-252
  39. Johnson K. Homeopathy for athletes. A new remedy for sore muscles. East West 1987;17(11):24-35
  40. Klaas CA, Wagner G, Laufer S, Sosa S, Della Loggia R, Bomme U, et al. Studies on the anti-inflammatory activity of phytopharmaceuticals prepared from Arnica flowers. Planta Medica 2002;68(5):385-391
  41. Lagrue G, Grillot A. Tobacco and Acupuncture. Nouvelle Presse Medicale 1977;6(36):3333-3334
  42. Linde K. Available controlled trials do not support the efficacy of homoeopathic Arnica. Focus on Alternative & Complementary Therapies 1999;4(3):131-132
  43. Lokken P, Straumsheim PA, Tveiten D, Skjelbred P, Borchgrevink CF. Effect of homoeopathy on pain and other events after acute trauma: placebo controlled trial with bilateral oral surgery. BMJ 1995;310(6992):1439-1442
  44. Lyb G, Schmidt TJ, Pahl HL, Merfort I. Anti-inflammatory activity of Arnica tincture (DAB 1998) using the transcription factor NF-kappaB as molecular target. Pharmaceutical & Pharmacological Letters 1999;9(1):5-8
  45. Machet L, Vaillant L, Callens A, Demasure M, Barruet K, Lorette G. Allergic contact dermatitis from sunflower (Helianthus annuus) with cross-sensitivity to arnica. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28(3):184-185
  46. MacKinnon S. Arnica montana. Canadian Pharmaceutical Journal 1992;125(3)
  47. Merfort I, Wendisch D, Jawara N, Lewith GT, Vickers AJ, Mullee MA. Flavonoidglycoside aus Arnica montana und Arnica chamissonis homoeopathic Arnica and Rhus toxicodendron for delayed onset muscle soreness: a pilot for a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. Planta Medica 1987;53(5):434-437
  48. Merfort I, Willuhn G, Jerga C. Arnica flowers German Pharmacopeia: test for purity. Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung 1990;130(May 3):980-984
  49. Merfort I. Arnica montana anti-inflammatory effect transcription factors NF-kappa B cytokines. Forschende Komplementarmedizin Und Klassische Naturheilkunde 2003;10:45- 48
  50. Mevorah B, Orion E, Matz H, Wolf R. Cutaneous side effects of alternative therapy. Dermatologic Therapy. 2003;16(2):141-149
  51. Millikan LE. Alternative therapy in pruritus. Dermatologic Therapy 2003;16(2):175-180
  52. Mitra S. Arnica montana: its unknown role in diabetes mellitus. Simillimum 2000;13(4):67-69
  53. Moog-Schulze JB. Een medisch experimenteel onderzoek naar de werkzaamheid van een uitwendige toepassing van Arnica-gelei. Tijdschrift voor Integrale Geneeskunde 1993;9(3):105-112
  54. Niebauer GW, Dorcsi M, Pfeil L. Effect of homoeopathic Arnica-D-12 and actihemyl on wound-healing in the animal-experiment. Praktische Tierarzt 1980;61(2):128-132
  55. Norred CL, Zamudio S, Palmer SK. Use of complementary and alternative medicines by surgical patients. AANA Journal 2000;68(1):13-18
  56. O'Meara S, Wilson P, Bridle C, Wright K, Kleijnen J. Homeopathy. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2002;11(2):189-194
  57. Paulsen E, Andersen KE, Hausen BM. Sensitization and cross-reaction patterns in Danish Compositae-allergic patients. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45(4):197-204
  58. Perry R, Dowrick C. Homeopathy and general practice: an urban perspective. British Homoeopathic Journal. 2000;89(1):13-16
  59. Pirker C, Moslinger T, Koller DY, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Cross-reactivity with Tagetes in Arnica contact eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1992;26(4):217-219
  60. Pradhan AC. A remedy for bruises as a constitutional remedy: a case of Arnica montana. Homoeopathic Links 1997;10(1):8-9
  61. Punzo A. Homeopathic medicine: an overview with specific applications for the orthopaedic patient. Techniques in Orthopaedics 2003;18(1):54-61
  62. Reichenberg-Ullman J, Ullman R. Think homeopathy for sports injuries. Townsend Letter 2003;240:61-65
  63. Reider N, Komericki P, Hausen BM, Fritsch P, Aberer W. The seamy side of natural medicines: contact sensitization to arnica (Arnica montana L.) and marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). Contact Dermatitis 2001;45(5):269-272
  64. Richardson J. Homeopathic Arnica. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003;96(4):204-204
  65. Riley D. Arnica montana and homeopathic dosing guidelines. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2003;112(2):693-693
  66. Rohan L. The effects of Arnica montana in dental extraction. Homeopathy in Practice 2003;3:42-43
  67. Roki D, Menkovic N, Savikin-Fodulovic K, Krivokuca-Dokic D, Grubisic D. Flavonoids and essential oil in flower heads of introduced Arnica chamissonis. Journal of Herbs, Spices, & Medicinal Plants 2001;8:419-427
  68. Rudzki E, Grzywa Z. Dermatitis from Arnica montana. Contact Dermatitis 1977;3(5):281- 282
  69. Scmidt TJ, Bomme U, Alfermann AW. Sesquiterpene lactone content in leaves of in vitro and field cultivated Arnica montana. Planta Medica 1998;64(3):268-270
  70. Shinde P. Importance of mental state in injury cases. Indian Journal of Homoeopathic Medicine 2001;33(3):31-32
  71. Siebenwirth J. Homeopathic Arnica in postoperative haematomas: a double-blind study. Forschende Komplementarmedizin Und Klassische Naturheilkunde 2001;8(3):172-175
  72. Sonawala S. Arnica: first alphabet of homoeopathy. Indian Journal of Homoeopathic Medicine 1986;21(2):33-34
  73. Stevinson C. Unconvincing results for Arnica in recovery from surgery. Focus on Alternative & Complementary Therapies 2002;7(3):265
  74. Tuten C, McClung J. Reducing muscle soreness with Arnica montana: is it effective? Alternative & Complementary Therapies 1999;5(6):369-372
  75. Uehleke B. Phytobalneology. Zeitschrift fur Phytotherapie 1996;17(1):26-43
  76. Wijnsma R, Woerdenbag HJ, Busse W. The importance of Arnica-species in phytomedicine. Zeitschrift fur Phytotherapie 1995;16(1):48-62
  77. Wijnsma R, Woerdenberg HJ, Van Der Molen J. The phytotherapeutic use of arnica. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad 1994;129(37):924-930
  78. Wilkens J, Ludtke R. Arnica 30x after knee surgery. British Homeopathic Journal 2000;89(Suppl. 1).
  79. Willuhn G, Leven W, Luley C. Arnica flowers German Pharmacopeia 10 (DAB 10): investigation of the qualitative and quantitative variability of sesquiterpene lactone contents of official Arnica crude drugs. Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung 1994;134(Oct 20):49-50, 52, 55-56, 58-59
  80. Willuhn G, Leven W. Quality of Arnica preparations: sesquiterpene lactone contents of tinctures and aqueous infusions. Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung 1995;135(May 25):33-36
  81. Willuhn G. Arnica montana L.: portrait of a medicinal plant. Pharmazeutische Zeitung 1991;136(Sep 12):9-12, 14, 18, 21, 24-26
  82. Willuhn G. Arnica montana: medicinal plant of the year 2000. Zeitschrift fur Arznei & Gewurzpflanzen 2001;6(2):51
  83. Wiluhn G, Junior I, Wendisch D. Desmethoxy-encecalin und Thymolderivate aus Arnica sachalinensis. Planta Medica 1986;5:349-351
  84. Woerdenbag HJ, Merfort I, Passreiter CM, Schmidt T, Willuhn G, Kampinga HH, et al. Cytotoxicity of flavonoids and sesquiterpene lactones from Arnica species. Planta Medica 1993;59(7 SUPPL).

DISCLAIMER: This summary does not provide specific medical advice and the information provided should not be used as a substitute for seeking medical advice from a registered health practitioner.
Back to top
Back to the Complementary and Alternative Therapies Evidence-based Summaries page

Website feedback
We welcome your feedback on this page.

Page last updated: 19 March 2009



In this summary:


Results summary

Background

  • Soft tissue injury
  • Arnica
  • Homoeopathy
  • Homoeopathic arnica
Evidence reviewed in this summary

  • Efficacy information
  • Safety information
Evidence on efficacy

Evidence on safety

Cited references

Additional references



Privacy | Copyright | Disclaimer | About Us | Access Keys | Feedback | Contact Us | Employment | newzealand.govt.nz